Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. ![]() | Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. ![]() |
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. ![]() | Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. ![]() |
***
Just over a decade ago, when the NDA was in power and Atal Behari Vajpayee’s health appeared to be failing, a prime ministerial balloon was floated in New Delhi. Jaswant Singh, who had served as finance, defence and foreign minister in the NDA regime, was suddenly being “discussed” as a replacement for Vajpayee. What was interesting about this “candidature” was that it was not floated by the BJP or even the NDA, but by foreign missions in Delhi and Indian journalists who were in touch with them. Foreign correspondents posted in New Delhi even did a few stories on the “PM candidate” who was clubbable, affable and spoke English in that grand manner. He was one individual in the BJP that westerners and Indians of a certain class could relate to. The “Jaswant for PM” idea was, however, quite bogus and completely out of sync with realpolitik.The “Chidambaram for PM” idea, similarly, is being taken more seriously in circles that only speak English instead of those who can revert to the vernacular in order to play a real political hand. Presumably, the latter would be more likely to read the political pulse. Most politicians, for instance, just say the idea is plain “ridiculous” and not worth discussing. A few give reasons for this. The CPI(M)’s Basudev Acharia just says, “Why do you ask if he can be the PM when it does not even look likely that the Congress will form the next government!” But that is the old Communist dismissal of individuals they believe are selling off the nation!
It is part of the game to discuss future scenarios, especially when elections in the world’s largest democracy are just a year away. The most plausible scenario emerging from the opposition corner is Gujarat CM Narendra Modi being the face of one campaign, while Rahul Gandhi will lead the other. But since Rahul has never shown the slightest inclination for office, there has been some speculation about the search for his Manmohan Singh. Since one plus one makes two and we do not have to balance the math of a budget before speculating, we may well ask: why not P. Chidambaram?
He seems good for the part, particularly if it’s up for discussion in editorial columns and TV studios. Chidambaram is bright, cogent, savvy, apparently attractive to middle class India, certainly comes through well on television, has been smiling a lot more at his press conferences, has friends in the corporate world (for some of whom he has also been a lawyer). And it is also said that he is quite the wit, with a penchant for dark sarcasm. And now he has delivered a reasonable budget. So why not Chidambaram as the running mate for reluctant prince Rahul?
|
The other argument for Chidambaram is that, like Modi, he is a tough “fix-it” guy who can be a counter to the Gujarat CM. But Modi has a proven electoral base while Chidambaram had difficulty winning his own seat in Tamil Nadu and is said to be quite unpopular with the current state leadership of the Congress party. Still, the lack of a mass base could be an advantage in selecting a partner to Rahul, as leaders with real bases do not always fare well in the Congress. Many have either carved an independent path (like Sharad Pawar) or been cut loose by the party (like Jagan Reddy).
So, if we start ticking the boxes, we may actually conclude that Chidambaram could be smart enough, but not popular enough, to play Manmohan’s part in the future. Presuming that Sonia and Rahul are convinced and inform the party of the choice, the real problem would be the regional players and parties. It is worth remembering that legislation pushed by the ministries Chidambaram has headed has often got stuck in Parliament because his management of other parties was poor and, quite perversely, his colleagues in the Congress often just stood by as his proposals sank. Now, one of his former colleagues inhabits Rashtrapati Bhawan. So why shouldn’t Chidambaram dream big?
By Saba Naqvi with Panini Anand
outlook